Actively hiring
Clinical Trial Software
As featured in
View 1 job
Claim pageClaim
Follow
Overview
News
Technologies
Salaries
Products
People
Growth
Offices
Jobs
Financials
Overview
CRIO is a software company that provides an eSource solution for clinical research sites and sponsors. Its platform replaces paper binders, automates workflows and supports virtual, hybrid and traditional study structures to improve protocol compliance and data quality. The company is headquartered in Boston, United States.
News
Introducing AI eSource Builder: Build eSource Templates Faster, Without Sacrificing Quality
By Mike Wenger Building eSource is detailed work. Your coordinators and study startup teams are good at it. The problem is how much time it consumes before they ever get to the decisions that actually require their judgment. Reading through a 200-page pro
Read more
Report
eSource to EDC Integration Is Finally Here: What It Means for Sites
By Rick Ward A recap of the CRIO x SCRS webinar Sites have been asking for it for years: a way to enter data once and have it flow where it needs to go, without the copy-paste grind between source documents and sponsor EDC systems. On a recent webinar co-
Read more
Report
The Site AI Playbook: Your Top Questions, Answered
By Brook White Last month, CRIO teamed up with Clinical Leader for a live panel, "The Site AI Playbook: Vendor Tools, Homegrown Solutions - What's Working." The conversation brought together site operators who are actively using AI in their day-to-day ope
Read more
Report
CRIO Vendor Sustainability Profile: Decarbonizing Clinical Trials by Design
By Marc Wartenberger For modern pharmaceutical sponsors and Contract Research Organizations (CROs), reducing corporate environmental impact requires looking closely at the vendor supply chain. Scope 3 emissions, which include the third-party software and
Read more
Report
Paper, EMR, or eSource? Comparing Data Collection Methods for Your Clinical Trial Site
By Brook White When it comes to capturing source data in clinical trials, research sites have more options than ever - but not all methods are created equal. According to this study from the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, there continues
Read more
Report
ICH E6(R3) Annex 2 Is Here: What Sponsors and Sites Need to Know
By Marc Wartenberger After years of anticipation, the final version of ICH E6(R3) Annex 2 was adopted on June 3, 2026. If you've been following the evolution of Good Clinical Practice guidance, you know that the core E6(R3) guideline, finalized in January
Read more
Report
What the Data Reveals about the Source Preparation Process
By Raymond Nomizu MetricData is ByQuartile 1MedianQuartile 3# of eSource builds per StudyStudy2612% of visits that are signed off by PIVisitn/a46%n/a# of internal comments left per completed visitVisit112 This blog post is the fourth in a series on site p
Read more
Report
What It Takes to Start a Study: Site Start-up Benchmarks
By Raymond Nomizu Metric Data is by Quartile 1 Median Quartile 3 Days from reg docs received to reg docs submitted Study 15 7 4 Days from budget received to budget returned Study 23 9 5 Days from site activation to first patient visit screened Study 34 20
Read more
Report
CRIO's Benchmarking Data: Differences in Small and Large Sites
By Raymond Nomizu This blog post is the second in a series on site performance KPIs based on an analysis CRIO performed for the Site Accreditation and Standards Institute (SASI), a nonprofit organization that serves as a quality accreditation organization
Read more
Report
Here are CRIO's Site KPIs: Benchmarks for the benefit of the industry
By Raymond Nomizu Data transparency is rare in this industry, especially among clinical research sites. To improve transparency, we conducted an analysis of various KPIs within our system, and contributed them to the Site Accreditation and Standards Insti
Read more
Report
Show more news
Tech stack
Technologies named in job postings at CRIO over the last 12 months, by layer, with the share of postings for each.
Technologies in use
7
Postings analysed
4
Stack modernity
67/100
Cloud & platforms
GitHub
Looker
Developer tools
Matter
FHIR
HL7
Practices & domains
21 CFR Part 11
CDISC
Sign in to see how your skills match this stack
Sign In
Salary insights
Compensation ranges based on this company's open jobs
Median
$150k
Typical range
$80k – $170k
Open positions
3
2
Jobs
Senior
50%
Architect
50%
| Level | Jobs | Median | Typical range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior | 1 | $150k | $150k |
| Architect | 1 | $170k | $170k |
Highest paying role
Director of Sponsor Operations
$170k
Normalized to USD per year
Growth
Hiring Momentum
25/100
Slowing
Open positions
3
0 opened / 0 closed in 30 days
Median time-to-fill
41 days
faster than 32% of the market
ATS activity
Every ~5 hours
Today
Hiring Focus
The percentage next to each role is its share of the company's job openings over the last 90 days; the arrow shows the shift versus the previous period.
Sales
60% ▼
Product
20% ▼
Solutions
20% ▲
Offices
Where the company hires and what each office is for
Cities
1
Hiring now
0
Countries
1
Boston
United States
HQ
Privacy Policy
68 Harrison Avenue #605, PMB 32876 Boston, MA 02111
Jobs
$120k – $150k per year • Remote (United States) • Full-Time • 5+ years exp • Bachelor's Degree
GitHub
Cybersecurity
GDPR
HIPAA
Management
Jira
Agile
Scrum
Life Sciences
CDISC
MedTech
21 CFR Part 11
HL7
FHIR
Apply
Financials
Total raised
$9M
Latest round
Series B
Funding rounds
1
Funding rounds
| Round | Announced | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series B | 2022 | $9M | Details |
